Advantages And Disadvantages Of Technology

Police Stun Guns and Patrol Car Video SurveillanceStudent s NameSchoolThe hobby of technology in dealing with execrables has long been debated upon . For instance , non bad(p) penalty via electric chair , gas chamber , and lethal barb is criticized for its inhuman and barbaric nature . And yet , victims of wicked reprehensible offenses and supporters of the death penalty find capital punishment as protection to the society (Koch 1985In the same way , the procedure of natural law bewilder guns is viewed by those against it as supernumerary infliction of disturbance and , therefore , inhuman . However aversion victims obtain the persona of sandbag guns in capturing their attackers as beneficial and valuable . as well as , the use of patrol railroad car surveillance has been criticized as hostility of privac y moreover individuals who yearns that the violation of their rights find justice see the use of patrol car surveillance as a valuable means to expediently suppressing the assailantsPolice Stun GunsBecause of the high crime rate in the country , many people cod succumbed to the inevitability of using constabulary nonplus guns to protect spare civilians from attackers as well as to taking into custody the assailants with tokenish misuse against the latter . Stun guns use high potential difference to stop an attacker by immobilizing him merely without inflicting unspoiled or permanent damage (Eaton , 2007 ) Two mechanisms impart this to reach : it confuses the sickening system by sending electric authoritative finished that system and it also causes the muscles of the body to contract cursorily qualification them do a lot of work in a short amount of time depleting their energy do them uneffective to move (Beatty , 2007Those against the use of stun guns m ay repugn that it is unnecessary infliction! of combat injury against the suspected assailant .

However , the fact remains that criminals who attempt to flee also need to be motherd for the benefit of the victim and this can be done with minimal harm against the assailant with the use of stun guns . Thus , stun guns do not only allow the victims to have their assailants captured but the offenders are also protected in the manner that the harm that they would receive is minimal as compared to cosmos subjected to shootingThose against the use of stun guns would also argue that this can be greatly step , if simplely legalized . Yes , abuse may be turn i n especially with the background of police officers . In my opinion save , it is not the mere use of stun guns that should be attacked but the wide use of it without measures that would protect the other innocent individuals to whom it may be used against . Using stun guns to pacify a criminal and preventing him to flee is necessary but using the stun guns for opprobrious purposes is not . The society will feel safer with the experience that their protectors , the police officers , are armed with effective means to capture the criminals about themPatrol Car Video SurveillanceThe use of patrol car pictorial matter surveillance has been attacked because of its...If you want to get a full essay, direct it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper