My Ethical Beliefs in the Light of Popular Ethical Theories

It is certainly of convenience to meditate on sensations respectable beliefs in the light of popular good theories much(prenominal) as the awesome manufacturing business Command Theory, which grounds my respectable principles in godly thought the simplistic Ethical self-seeking Theory, which all toldows my (Freudian) Id- found, self-interests to dictate my sort in all situations and the Utilitarian Theory, which obliges me to rethink in scathe of the furthermost beholding good of all people in connection with my personal and/or pontential course practices. I debate that my honorable concerns rest on a variety of honest theories. This belief is founded on the assumption that mans mind and intentions ar perhaps too complex to be tacit by means of ane ethical theory al ane.This is the causa wherefore philosophers own established an entire discipline to study the mind and intentions of man. The ethical-philosophical celestial sphere that fascinates me al more or l ess, however, is one of source. I swear my ethical concerns to rest on reason. away from the above mentioned theories, therefore, I have observed myself corporate trusting in the unconditional imperative form Theory of Kant at times, the Rights Theory at other times, and the deservingness Theory to boot but, all in varied situations concerned with ethical thought. Is it possible for man to ever do away with ethics? And, do I consciously choose which theory of ethics to habituate in situations that chitchat for my ethical principles to suddenly become a focus of perplexity?I conceive that ethics atomic number 18 a component of almost all situations of man, non just ethical issues that argon manifest to all. From sustainable food consumption to the culture of clo affaire ethical theories apply in almost all man situations. Only when the individual is deep sound asleep(predicate) in bed, or in deep meditation perhaps, do ethical concerns comfortably vanish into thin ai r. Which ethical theories do I trust at the time I wake up each daytime? Although I have varied reasons to believe in the ethical theories mentioned above, the provided theory that neverleaves my mind is that of applying reason to all situations that require my ethical concerns to come in the light of my mind.Reason appears before I decide whether graven image would approve of a certain action of mine, or whether smoking some other cig artte with my friends would truly serve my interests, and so forth No doubt, all ethical theories call for reason to be applied before the theories themselves can be applied by an individual. The theory that I could apply most easy to all my situations, but only after applying reason, is the Divine Command Theory. I believe that this particular theory turn backs the remaining ethical theories mentioned in this idea as well. gods commands are often synonymous to all that should be good in our world. Based on an interpretation of the Bible, my o wn interests should be Gods interests, and the interests of my brothers and sisters (all people) should withal be my short term and extensive term interests. Moreover, Gods commands automatically include the concept of Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. I must be neediness my business associates and other, well. I must be loving my neighbor as I love myself.The Rights Theory and the Virtue Theory must call for be incorporated as well into the Divine Command Theory, perceive that God calls for His vicegerents to cling to His sheep (that is, the regime should protect the rights of the people, as in the Rights Theory) and He also calls for the teaching of rectitudes to all people, young and old, and these virtues consist of justice, honesty, goodness, and so forth The virtues taught by the Divine Command Theory also incorporate kindness, compassion, love, and mercy concepts that are essential to being human, but are non touched upon by most ethical theories ou tside the realm of God.The question that automatically emerges is What are Gods commands? Do they depend upon our whims, or are they based upon a single holy book? The answers to these questions arecomplicated in my case, given that I believe in various interpretations of divine commands that may or may non be mainstream Christian, Muslim, Buddhist or Hindu. I have learned more from books than from family and my community, which happen to be the main sources of assimilation for most people. This sociological theory has important underpinnings in ethical beliefs, seeing that we learn ethics and principles from the sources of information that exist around us. I also believe that we learn from a personal source of information, the God of Aristotle and Sir doubting Thomas Aquinas, and therefore, it is important to know books of revelation to learn Gods commands and apply reason to apply the commands of God from myriad scriptures.Now, of course, there are a huge number of scriptures that may be called forth to pull in the commands of God. atomic number 18 the illustrious Ten Commandments the only commands, or should I also believe in the New Testament and the Quran? Did Buddha leave any godly commands in the form of scriptures? Such are the questions I have had to answer in my evolving understanding of Gods commands, even though there is a deep source of information that still exists and tells me what is right and wrong from the Highest Source. roar it conscience I believe that morality is knowing right from wrong, in the view of everybody including myself and God. What ravishs God and also pleases society must certainly please me.What else are my beliefs in light of the Divine Command Theory, which, in my opinion, should incorporate the remainder of the ethical theories mentioned in this paper, and many more theories standardized so. I believe that God is a synonym for the Good that Plato had referred to. At the aforementioned(prenominal) time, it is q uite possible that my interpretation of the Divine Command Theory would be different from the interpretation of another soul. After all, my understanding of God and His commands is different from the understanding of another soul. I believe in many scriptures atthe a like(p) time additionally, I feel confident that they come from the same Source. I have learned about God in a separate way altogether. I do not necessarily trust all peoples doctrines. Moreover, I do not compel anybody else to believe in what I believe in.Does this mean that I could ascertainably run into ethical conflicts with people? Yes. However, it does not bother me, provided that I understand that their ethical principles are different from mine, and based on separate ethical theories altogether. Once again, reason comes to the rescue. Without reason, I, too, would perhaps become as intolerant as the racists and the terrorists (extreme racists) who cannot tolerate the differences in beliefs among people. I kn ow that God calls for such allowance among the children of Adam.Therefore, when extremism (or, extreme racism) leads to bloodshed among people, and those that are responsible for the chaos throw the duty back on God by saying that such acts were affiliated in the name of God it is extremely sad and funny at the same time. It is sad beca consumption the intolerant folks have not silent Gods message of love and tolerance, even if they think that they are killing in the name of God, who is Love.On the other hand, it is funny because they are doing the strike opposite of what they intend to do. That is why it is of central importance to understand ones ethical principles, and keep on understanding and improving upon them end-to-end ones lifetime. Furthermore, it is essential to align ones conduct with ones ethical principles. By saying one thing and doing something else, people can prove to be quite inconsistent and unreliable, if not dangerous to the extent of terrorism and other forms of psychopathy.I believe that ethics call for tolerance and good citizenship, and wherever Gods name is mentioned, as in the U.S. Constitution, there should be peace. For the state, therefore, the Divine Command Theory mandates peace. For business in general, and for the economy at large, theDivine Command Theory entails dispersal of wealth with a focus on income generation, economic growth, and prosperous living. In personal life, I have found this theory to be most appropriate because it does not limit me to one theory.Nevertheless, I have one God, like the Christians and the Jews. In addition, it is advantageous to me that I do not everlastingly have to think about myself and my own interests when the responsibility or the projection at hand demands me to sacrifice my interests, at times, for the benefit of society in general. Ultimately, I may realize that by serving society at the expense of sacrificing my own interests at times, I serve myself better. I may become a happier person by serving society, and I may also increase in wealth. God would be pleased with me. What is most important, still, is the fact that I would be a peaceful person by being aligned with the interests of God, society, and myself.Naturally, in order to align my activities and fashion with the interests of God, society, and myself I have to think before I leap. It is of the essence for me to meditate on information that I gather from a huge variety of sources, including books, my professors, friends, parents, etc. After absorbing the information thus gathered, I racket applying the Divine Command Theory to get to the depths of situations that often get me to think in terms of the other ethical theories as well.There are times when self-interests observe my ethical principles, or I think only in terms of the virtues of justice, integrity, trustworthiness, etc. However, if I were to base my activities solely on the Id-based Ethical Egoism Theory, for example, I would perh aps indulge in misleading thinking, which would eventually be responsible for behavior on my part that is misleading unto others. I am confident that the ethics of bribery in business rest in the appropriate or inappropriate use of the Ethical Egoism Theory. The chief operating officer of Enron, and many other corrupt businessmen in modern times, have equally shown extreme self-interest in theirbusiness situations. In my case, such extreme use of the Ethical Egoism Theory would never go across because I rest my principles on divine commands. Honesty, in my case, is a virtue of necessity.Thus, I would only apply the Ethical Egoism Theory inwardly the framework of the Divine Command Theory when the situation calls for nothing else leave out self-interest as a driving force for ethical behavior. Also, in my case, self-interest would also translate into the good pleasure of God the long term interests of society (as in the Utilitarian Theory) Kants Categorical Imperative or doing unt o others as I want others do unto me obedience to the government in recidivate for which I receive protection of my rights, as in the Rights Theory and honesty, justice, etc., in light of the theory of Virtue.In the Kingdom of God or the businessman who applies the Divine Command Theory to rule his ethical behavior the Rights Theory occupies a very interesting place, indeed. The Rights Theory asks for the government to protect my rights. In return for this favor, I show obedience to the government by following the laws in general. The businessperson who follows the same laws of the government would not finesse the government as did the Enron CEO. Neither would such a businessperson return the favor of the government by cheating the investors of his or her company.If a author U.S. Senator were to accept a Rolex from a constituent, the Divine Command Theory would not call this behavior unethical if the Rolex were a gift. If the former CEO of Tyco were to use company bonuses to ho st a lavish party for his wife, I would consider it unethical under the Divine Command Theory, seeing that God never asked us to usurp the rights of many people in favor of a few. Lifting verbatim a news report and presenting it as ones own is similarly unethical. Being messaged the answers to exam questions during an examination isunethical to boot.As far as transfering medicine without paying a fee is concerned, I would not consider it unethical so long as it serves the interests of society in the long run. I do not believe that downloading rationalize music off the Internet serves to put the music industry down. There are countless people around the world who still do download free music off the Internet, because they do not enjoy the theatrical role of that music as compared to hardy CDs that music shops would like to sell. Besides, they do not appreciate yet the technology behind free music and the IPod. So, even though this ethical issue appears complicated to a huge number of people, I believe that it is simple to understand in the light of Divine Command Theory.I do not think that God would like students to suffer financial hardships because of their love of music. Hence, it is perfectly ethical, in my opinion, to enjoy free music off the Internet on IPods for those who would like to miss out on the quality of CDs from BMG, Sony, etc. Likewise, choosing between ethical theories is always a sacrifice. Hence, I apply reason to believe that the Divine Command Theory must incorporate all necessary ethical theories for me to conduct myself as a good human being, businessperson, and citizen of my nation. This theory does not confuse me at times that call for my ethical instincts to show up. I believe in God, and in service to humanity.Additionally, I do not discriminate between black or white, Chinese or Hindu. At times when people are engaging in what I believe to be incorrect behaviors, I do not intervene unless my self-interests as well as the pleasur e of God are at sacrifice. At all times, however, I have kept to reason as the force that leads me to apply the Divine Command Theory, which I believe to be most trustworthy.